The New York City Draft Riots and the Colored Orphan Asylum 4th grade · age 9
The orphanage's board wanted to rebuild the Colored Orphan Asylum on Fifth Avenue where it had always stood, but the neighbors did not want it there. Should the city have let the orphanage rebuild in its old neighborhood even though most of the neighbors objected?
Under what conditions should majority rule be limited or minority rights protected?
The Judgment Lab asks: What do we think about that? When we work on the Judgment Lab, our ultimate goal is to articulate our own principles and values in a thoughtful and respectful way.
As you learned in the reading, the Colored Orphan Asylum was a home for two hundred and thirty-three Black children on Fifth Avenue in New York City. Quaker women started it in 1836, and the staff there fed, taught, and cared for the children every day. Some of those children were sons and daughters of Union soldiers fighting in the Civil War. The asylum was one of the clearest signs that some White New Yorkers cared for children of color.
In July 1863, angry mobs rioted across Manhattan. Rioters were furious about an unfair draft law and believed Black workers would take their jobs. The mob marched to the orphan asylum and broke down the front door with an axe. While the crowd was busy at the front, the superintendent, William Davis, and the head matron, Jane McClellan, quietly led all the children out the back. The children walked to a police station, and from there they were taken to Blackwell's Island. Behind them, the rioters stole everything they could carry and set the building on fire and destroying it. Every child was alive, but the home those children had known was gone.
After the riots ended, the orphanage's leadership tried to rebuild on Fifth Avenue where the Asylum had always stood. But the neighboring residents pushed them to go somewhere else. The board was forced farther and farther away — first to a small temporary building on Fifty-First Street, and then all the way up to 143rd Street, nearly a hundred blocks from the old spot. None of the rioters who burned down the asylum were ever punished. There is still no marker at the spot today. In April 2026, the City Council heard a bill called Intro 496. It asks for a study of ways to mark the draft riots. The bill is still waiting in a committee, a small group that looks at a bill first. The Judgment Lab asks you to think about whether the city should have let the orphanage rebuild in its old neighborhood even though the neighbors objected.
The Judgment Lab asks about majority rule and minority rights, so let's make sure we understand those terms. Majority rule means that when a group makes a decision, the side with the most people gets its way — like when a class votes and the choice with the most hands raised wins. Minority rights are protections for smaller groups of people so that the bigger group cannot treat them unfairly, even if most people want to. In the reading, the neighbors around Fifth Avenue were the majority, and the Black orphan children and the people who cared for them were the minority.
Should the city have let the Colored Orphan Asylum rebuild on Fifth Avenue, even though most of the neighbors did not want it there?
Follow the steps below to complete this Judgment Lab. By the end of the lab, you will have decided whether you think the city should have let the orphanage rebuild in its old neighborhood even though the neighbors objected. You will also articulate and test your principles about when majority rule should be limited or minority rights protected.
Step one
Generating claims
The orphanage's board wanted to rebuild the Colored Orphan Asylum on Fifth Avenue where it had always stood, but the neighbors did not want it there. Should the city have let the orphanage rebuild in its old neighborhood even though most of the neighbors objected?
Yes
No
Step two
Articulating principles and values
Under what conditions should majority rule be limited or minority rights protected?
Always, never, or sometimes?
Principles
I think that majority rule should be limited or minority rights protected when...
Values and beliefs
I think that because I believe that...
Step three
Testing principles on a new case
Little Rock's Nine Students
In 1954, the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court, decided that it was against the law to keep Black children and white children in separate public schools. Three years later, in 1957, nine Black teenagers in Little Rock, Arkansas, signed up to attend Central High School, a big school that had only allowed White students before.
Most White people in Little Rock did not want the school to change. The governor of Arkansas, Orval Faubus, sent soldiers from the state's National Guard to stand in front of the doors and block the nine students from going in. Crowds of angry neighbors gathered on the sidewalk, shouted at the students, and told them to go away. The nine students had done nothing wrong. They just wanted to go to the school near their homes.
President Dwight Eisenhower had to decide what to do. Even though most voters in Little Rock, and the governor they had elected, wanted the school kept White-only, the president sent United States Army soldiers to Little Rock in September 1957. The soldiers walked the nine students through the front doors and stayed at the school to protect them. The students finished the year, and Central High School stayed open to Black students from then on.
Apply your principle to the new case
According to your general principle, was President Eisenhower right to send soldiers so the nine Black students could attend Central High School even though most people in Little Rock objected? Why or why not?
From The New York City Draft Riots and the Colored Orphan Asylum, a 4th grade history lesson on Pallas.